On-demand until 16 June 2022
Having seen Marcus Brigstocke’s name attached to it, I instantly assumed this would be a broadly comic play that was strong on laughs and reasonably light on subject matter. Although there are plenty of funny lines and witty remarks in The Red, it is essentially a far more sobering affair than that – and I use the word “sobering” quite deliberately.
For this is a play about two men’s relationship with the bottle and how both have come to terms with something that can give pleasure but also is capable of delivering a whole world of pain.
The title refers to a bottle of Chateau Lafitte 1978 (“Judicious, venerable, earthy bouquet of cedar chest, pencil shavings, tobacco leaves, cigar box, dried rose petal, tar, wet soil, and a suggestion of molasses and smoke … concluding with a long, leathery finish” – Cellartracker.com). This is part of a bequest and has been set aside for father and son John and Benedict to drink and enjoy together.
There are just two problems – the former has died and is in no position to drink anything and the latter is a recovering alcoholic … and is in no position to drink anything. The play that follows is essentially a dialogue between their respective positions as a ghostly manifestation advances reasons to support and enjoy oenology while the other reflects on 25 years of sobriety and the benefits that this has brought. “Why do you drink?” asks the son; “because I like it” replies his dad. “Why don’t you drink?” counters the elder; “because I like it” is the dry (in every sense) response.
Brigstocke has based the play on his own early life struggle to control addictions and his bid for sobriety by enrolling onto a twelve-step programme which has now stood him in good stead for over thirty years. Like the younger protagonist in his play, he too, has a father immersed in the world and the rituals of the wine connoisseur but has concluded that the benefits of staying dry outweigh other considerations.
That said the writer advances both sides of the argument with equal clarity (or should that be claret- y?). Yes, it can get a little repetitive and there is the occasional glib line which could only exist in something artfully constructed but there’s no denying the essential power of the piece. It can also seem a little static and betrays its origins as a radio play but in the main it is a gripping account with some knife edge “will he, won’t he?” moments. This main tension centres on whether Benedict will succumb to his father’s initial request to drink again; this is just sufficient to sustain the piece for the hour for which it runs. The pace doesn’t flag and provides a really interesting point of debate which gradually broadens into an examination of a whole relationship between a parent and a grown child. As the roles are taken by real life father/son Bruce and Sam Alexander this adds an extra dimension to the drama; the familial bond lends the playing a certain ease and believability which ensures that the piece is never less than watchable.
‘A gripping account with some knife-edge will-he-won’t-he moments’: @johnchapman398 on @marcusbrig’s #TheRed, on-demand with @OriginalTheatre til 16 Jun. #onlineshows #theatrereviews #featured
‘A bottle & two men, but also much more’: @LouReviewsBlog on @OriginalTheatre’s on-demand premiere of @marcusbrig’s #TheRed, inspired by his own recovery from alcoholism. Available til 16 Jun. #onlineshows #theatrereviews #featured